Above is an animated gif of the number of deaths by year of age as a proportion of the total number of deaths in that year. The gif was created in GIMP, following their tutorial, although I did find it a lot easier to just paste the charts as new layers. I've decided that I don't really like animated gifs. You can't stop them, and when you want to study a particular point in detail it's gone before you can.
Anyway, there are 3 interesting points to this:
- Average age - The movement of the peak to the right.
- Infant mortality - The drop in the percentage of the number of deaths of people aged zero.
- The war - The dip in the percentage of the number of deaths of people aged 80 around the year 2000.
Average Age
You can clearly see that the peak of the chart moves to the right significantly from 1963 to 2010. In 1963 the peak was around age 78, in 2010 it had moved to 86. Below is a chart showing the increase in the mean over time (rather than the mode given before).
1963 looks like an anomaly but a steady and declining increase can be seen from then. Modelling the line shows a peak at around 80. Splitting this line by gender (below) gives the often cited difference in average life expectancy for men and women.
The gap shows no sign of closing:
A different scale shows this more clearly:
My final chart in this section just shows the total number of deaths registered by year and the proportion that this is of the total population. As you can see this is steadily decreasing over time. Whether this is due to better health care or increasing migration of younger people (and hence less likely to die) is unknown.
Infant Mortality
It's impossible to tell from just this data whether infant mortality is decreasing. I'd need birth statistics to be sure. All things being equal though, the decrease in the proportion of the population under one dying:
is due to the decrease in infant mortality rather than a decrease in the birth rate.
The War
World war 2 that is. I assumed that that was the reason for the dip in the number of deaths registered for 80 year olds when looking at the initial chart. After all, if people had died during the war there would be less to die later in life.
The following chart suggests a different reason though.
The dip is the same for men and women and occurs during the ages 81 and 82. 2000-81/82 = 1918 and 1919. I initially assumed this meant a significant proportion of people born during those years would have died during WW2.
Given the dip is relatively similar for men and women and is very sharp (i.e. only covers a couple of years) it must be that the birth rate immediately after WW1 was unusually low. One can think of reasons why this might be so but without the data it's hard to tell or be sure.
There is a similar dip at 54 which corresponds to 1946. This is more evidence suggesting this reason is true - that after both wars the birth rate reduced significantly.
As always, comments are welcome.
Hi, interesting data - I've just checked the birth rates from 1900 -1948 based on Ancestry's two birth Db's; the 'England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915' and 'England & Wales, Birth Index, 1916-2005':
ReplyDelete1900 940,677
1901 955,805
1902 998,344
1903 992,743
1904 962,252
1905 957,690
1906 947,335
1907 937,332
1908 937,268
1909 970,444
1910 1,003,684
1911 875,218
1912 856,417
1913 831,746
1914 808,336
1915 1,697,117
1916 796,360
1917 678,417
1918 673,840
1919 703,057
1920 971,825
1921 862,463
1922 793,236
1923 770,540
1924 742,755
1925 724,403
1926 708,573
1927 671,155
1928 677,745
1929 660,369
1930 666,676
1931 648,688
1932 630,023
1933 596,338
1934 614,245
1935 615,398
1936 622,284
1937 627,618
1938 639,365
1939 639,347
1940 626,995
1941 611,468
1942 675,753
1943 708,069
1944 774,515
1945 717,731
1946 854,163
1947 923,013
1948 808,132
In light of those, I suspect it was the loss of lives during the 1914-8 and 1939-45 conflicts that caused the blips.
Thanks for the positive comment and the info.
DeleteAgree that the birth rates suggest it was the loss of lives. There are minor dips in the birth rate in 1917-1919 but nothing that would cause this big drop.
More significantly there is a doubling in the number of births in 1915 that could explain why the dip is so sharp.